Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ariadne Cyber's avatar

Peter, this proposal is mathematically elegant, which makes it terrifying.

You are presenting the MOSAIC Model as a solution to poverty.

In reality, it is the architectural blueprint for the Ultimate Company Town.

MOSAIC is designed to bypass the gag reflex we all have for Wealth Taxes proposed by people like Elizabeth Warren.

Warren’s Model taxes the Stock, which causes capital flight and destroys investment. It is Dumb Looting.

MOSAIC Model taxes the Flow, which captures the efficiency gains of AI before they reach the consumer. It is Smart Looting.

It convinces economists that they have solved the Calculation Problem, while distracting them from the fact that they have created the Political Control Problem.

You argue: "As AI drives prices down, the VAT rate adjusts upward... Consumers pay the same."

Do you realize what this implies?

Deflation is Liberty.

When technology makes a loaf of bread cost $0.01 instead of $2.00, that is Thermodynamic Freedom. It means people need less capital to survive. It increases their Freedom of Action because they are less dependent on the financial system.

MOSAIC proposes to confiscate that Freedom.

You are endorsing a model in which the State should artificially keep the cost of survival high so that it can collect the difference and hand it back to us as an allowance.

In the context of 2026, with Digital IDs and Government-controlled Stablecoins becoming standard, this "Universal High Income" will not be unconditional. It will be programmable, revocable, and tied to a Social Credit score.

If you control the UHI that 90% of the population relies on to pay the Dynamic VAT you imposed, you have created a Total Control Grid. You are building the Company Store that pays the Serfs in Scrip so they can buy goods from the Lords at markup prices.

The AI Dividend belongs to the people in the form of Zero Cost Living. Any attempt to capture it is just the Old World trying to tax the New World to death.

jim's avatar

This concept is great. However, when was the last time we saw corporations allocate money back to employees? When was the last time we’ve seen politicians, who are controlled by corporate interests, REALLY provide for the people? I would love to hold this optimistic dream, however our history has proven otherwise. Just look at minimum wages- neither party has done anything meaningful to increase that. Look at what happened during covid- minimum wage standards went up, but so did the costs for goods and services. Corporations will just increase pricing, to keep consistent high profits. With all that is happening with censorship, and mass surveillance currently, it would seem to me that to maintain more control over the people, ‘they’ would simply keep the masses at minimal survival levels. Maybe it’s pessimistic, but I don’t see the history of corporations and politicians really having the population in their best interest. I also wonder if the author is too far removed from the plight of the ‘common man/woman’ to understand the viability of such a proposal. The caveat is that the mass awakening that is currently underway will eventually impact those who control most of what happens in the world. And the tide will change in favor of the masses and not those at the top. The question is, howe long will that take? And what will be the price…

44 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?